College Media Network

Letter to the Editor

Does the Quick Center discriminate?

Print this article

Published: Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Updated: Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Quick Center

To the Editor,

I had made plans for my family, including my three children to attend the Cashore Marionette show at the Quick Center at Fairfield University Sunday at 1 p.m. with a group of other families. I've come to find out that they do not allow people less than two years of age to attend because they've had too many disruptions. This means that my family cannot attend the show together because our youngest family member is seven months old.


The show we wish to attend is a children's show taking place in the middle of the day. I've been to other theaters where the policy is that unruly people are asked to leave the auditorium if the need arises, and are reminded by those that work at the theater if they don't do it on their own.


Isn't it considered discrimination to say that people of a certain age are not allowed to attend something at a University? The Box Office Manager also told me that it is a fire hazard to have children on the laps of parents. I can't imagine that when a 3-year-old wants to sit on a parent's lap they are told that it is a fire hazard. It's not a hazard in any other venue or public place that I know of.


The Quick Center Web site states, "…It is situated in a continuously growing community that serves a large and ethnically diverse population, an ideal environment where the Center can grow while meeting the needs of the surrounding community… Events include popular and classical music, dance, theatre, special events, and programs for young audiences."


I find this a misleading, as in actuality it serves all but those with families that include young children. I'd imagine that is a large population of the community.


Perhaps I am incorrect to assume that the events taking place at the Quick Center are considered University-administered programs because it clearly states on the website that Fairfield University, "…does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, marital status, sexual orientation, religion, age, national origin or ancestry, disability, or handicap in administration of its educational policies, admissions policies, employment policies, scholarship and loan programs, athletic programs, or other University-administered programs."


I am greatly disappointed to learn that my youngest child has been discriminated against due to his young age and that the actions of other people have negatively affected my families' ability to attend together a children's show at The Quick Center for the Arts.
I hope other families with young children will take this into consideration when choosing a venue to support.

 

Sincerely,       
S. Niles

Comments

2 comments
Ite Incendite
Thu Nov 20 2008 10:09
I am sorry, I posted this in response to a letter to the editor attacking President-Elect Obama. I confused names. Niles, I am sorry, this was not directed at you. I share your frustration with your situation, and hope that the Quick Center no longer discriminates against young children. I support you. Once again, sorry.
Ite Incendite
Wed Nov 19 2008 18:43
I suppose we should have voted for a man who helped start a war which killed hundreds of thousands of people? That sounds very moral. The problem with Mr. Niles' rationale is that he wishes to impose his religious views upon other people. If one disagrees with abortion, then one should not get an abortion. There is no reason to impose this opposition upon women who are not mentally, physically or emotionally prepared to raise a child (often when they are still in high school!). President-Elect Obama (and yes, Niles, it gives me great pleasure to know that every time you read President-Elect next to the name Obama you cringe) never said that he likes abortion, indeed, as a man of faith I am certain that he has many problems with it. He understands, however, that it is not big government's business to intrude upon people's lives and throw women in jail for ending a pregnancy that they do not wish to have. It is right-wing nut jobs such as Niles who caused John McCain's defeat; America is not a right-wing country, it is one of moderation. As soon as the Republican party sees this and begins nominating candidates who do not wish to impose fanatical, Taliban-style religious views upon citizens, we will see a Republican in the White House again.
Another thing, Niles, what would you do with all the babies born to mothers who cannot raise them? President Bush has said that adoption is a way to mitigate the process but lunnies like yourself also want to outlaw the right of same-sex couples to adopt children. If you were to have your way and millions of same-sex families were no longer allowed to be loving mothers and fathers, who would be able to adopt so many children caused by heterosexual infidelities? Just wondering.